All posts

The $20M Insight: Why Digital Endpoints Are Becoming Biotech’s Best Investment

What if a single digital endpoint could change the trajectory of an entire clinical program? Faced with a small Phase 2 study and endpoints not able to show true therapeutic impact, a biotech turned to DEEP Measures to quickly uncover whether a digital measure could deliver real value. This case study shows how a rapid ROI analysis revealed a surprising 13× return and why digital endpoints may be the smartest investment smaller teams can make.
The Challenge

A biotech company approached DEEP Measures about the possibility of using a digital endpoint in upcoming phase 2 and phase 3 studies. Their phase 2 was to be a small proof-of-concept study and they know that the standard endpoints may not be sensitive enough to demonstrate impact given the mechanism-of-action for their therapy. The clinical study team was keen on exploring the use of a digital endpoint but they needed to see if they could justify the investment.

The Approach

DEEP performed a high-level Return-on-Investment calculation intended to support a fast go/no-go rationale for proposing digital endpoints within the clinical program.

ROI was quantified as Expected Value Uplift ($) from adding digital measurements divided on Incremental Cost ($) of the digital measures development & implementation cost:

Definition of “ROI”: Digital measures are justified if they increase expected program value by either:

  1. Accelerating time-to-market / time-to-inflection (avoiding an extra study; faster Phase 2b/3 decisions; earlier partnering)
  2. Increasing Probability of Success (PoS) by reducing endpoint noise and strengthening mechanistic plausibility,
  3. Improving differentiation (especially on behavioral health, stress/arousal, caregiver burden), improving partnering economics and/or access narrative.

We calculate each as an Expected Value (EV) term, then sum them.

Assumptions
  1. Trials for the given indication are endpoint-noise-limited: Caregiver-reported scales remain essential, but objective corroboration is valuable in small-N, open-label settings.
  2. The therapy’s differentiation goes beyond an in-clinic assessment: The mechanistic story supports benefits in behavioral dysregulation, stress/arousal, sleep stability, and caregiver burden, domains where digital signals can be more sensitive and less biased.
  3. Even low probabilities justify the spend: Because the digital package cost is low relative to clinical program spend, a small probability of avoiding a delay or improving a key inflection point creates meaningful expected value.
  4. Digital measure investment: estimated at $1.5M one-off cost including endpoint definition, tech setup, analytical validation, trial deployment
Impact

Lever 1: Expected Value of Time Acceleration: $7.5M

Lever 2: Expected Value of Probability of Success: $4.5M

Lever 3: Expected Value of Differentiation: $7.5M

Total Expect Value Uplift: $19.5M

With approximately $20M expected value uplift for a $1.5M investment in using a digital endpoint, the expected ROI is 13x.

Key Learnings
  • For small pharma companies and biotechs that do not have well-development digital endpoint teams, it can be daunting to consider integrating a digital endpoint into a clinical program.
  • Ironically, organizations with higher pressure to meet milestone goals and timelines may in fact be better served by utilizing digital endpoints.
  • A digital endpoint may not help all programs, but DEEP Measures can help organizations quickly evaluate whether a digital endpoint may add advantage to a program.
Call to Action

If you’re interested in learning how DEEP Measures can help you select and use a digital endpoint in your clinical research program, contact us.

Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest solutions, new opportunities and expert insights on digital health measures delivered to your inbox.

Blog

More insights from experts

Discover related research in digital clinical innovation